Feminists cry wolf

The Corner at National Review Online has a post which demonstrates that any Supreme Court nominee of a Republican president will be painted with the same brush regardless of facts.

1975: According to Nan Aron, then the president of the Women's Legal Defense Fund, John Paul Stevens should be opposed because had shown "blatant insensitivity to discrimination against women."

1990: With the nomination of David Souter, Molly Yard, then the president of NOW, declared that confirming Souter would mean "ending freedom for women in this country." NOW howled that his confirmation meant "Women will die."

What makes their ridiculous comments even more laughable is the fact that Stevens and Souter are two of the more liberal justices on the court.